Hello everyone,
We’ve put together a draft to formalize some basic rules to guide Fingerprints governance and provide clarity and safety for important decisions.
Google docs with the live draft over here:
Hello everyone,
We’ve put together a draft to formalize some basic rules to guide Fingerprints governance and provide clarity and safety for important decisions.
Google docs with the live draft over here:
Thanks @lucaspon ! Very well-written and straightforward. My only comment is that maybe we should define what a “significant deployment of resources” is.
Nice simple write-up, thanks.
Should probably put some timelines on 2a/2b/2c in the procedure – at least guidelines (appreciating sometimes we may need to rush a vote).
Only thing I don’t like is the supermajority decision. Looking at holders, it appears the top 10 alone could satisfy the 35% criteria (less if it’s meant to be 35% excluding treasury) so this clause effectively gives that group full control. I think it’s just not necessary.
I agree, there are ways to overcome this through. Either through quadratic voting or reputation voting. There are projects that are creating means of non-financial governance through SBTs/Badge-like systems.